RTGS vs NEFT: What is the difference?

 RTGS (Real-Time Gross Settlement) and NEFT (National Electronic Funds Transfer) are two popular electronic payment systems used for transferring money between banks. While both systems enable electronic funds transfers, they differ in terms of how transactions are processed, speed, and use cases.

1. Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS)

Key Features:

  • Real-Time Processing: Transactions are processed in real-time as they are initiated. This means the money is transferred instantly, without any delay.
  • Gross Settlement: Each transaction is processed individually (on a one-to-one basis), rather than being grouped with other transactions. This ensures immediate settlement.
  • High-Value Transactions: RTGS is primarily used for large, high-value transactions. In many countries, there’s a minimum transaction limit (e.g., in some cases, around ZMW 10,000 or equivalent in local currency), but no maximum limit.
  • Instant and Final Settlement: Once processed, the transaction is irrevocable and considered final.
  • Availability: RTGS operates during the business hours of the central bank or as prescribed by regulatory authorities, but it may not be available 24/7 in some countries.

Use Case:

RTGS is ideal for high-value, time-sensitive transactions that require immediate clearing, such as large business payments, real estate transactions, or interbank transfers.

2. National Electronic Funds Transfer (NEFT)

Key Features:

  • Batch Processing: Unlike RTGS, NEFT transactions are processed in batches at regular intervals (e.g., every 30 minutes or hourly). This means there is a slight delay in the transfer of funds.
  • Deferred Settlement: NEFT transfers are settled in batches, meaning that payments are grouped together and processed in bulk, rather than individually.
  • No Minimum Transaction Limit: NEFT typically doesn’t have a minimum transaction limit, making it suitable for smaller transactions. However, the system may have an upper limit, depending on the country or bank.
  • Lower-Value Transfers: NEFT is generally used for lower-value transactions compared to RTGS.
  • Availability: NEFT can be available 24/7 in many countries, including weekends and holidays, though some countries might limit it to business hours.

Use Case:

NEFT is suitable for smaller, non-urgent transactions like personal payments, utility bill payments, or routine business transactions where immediate settlement is not critical.

Comparison Summary:

FeatureRTGS (Real-Time Gross Settlement)NEFT (National Electronic Funds Transfer)
Settlement TypeIndividual (Gross Settlement)Batch-based (Deferred Settlement)
SpeedReal-time (instant)Delayed (batch processing)
Transaction LimitTypically for high-value transactionsSuitable for small to medium transactions
Minimum LimitOften has a minimum (e.g., ZMW 10,000)No minimum (any amount can be transferred)
Maximum LimitNo upper limitMay have upper limits depending on the bank
AvailabilityUsually during business hours24/7 in some cases, or during banking hours
Use CaseLarge, urgent transactionsSmall to medium, non-urgent transactions
CostHigher feesLower fees

Conclusion:

  • RTGS is preferred for high-value, time-sensitive transfers where immediate settlement is crucial.
  • NEFT is more appropriate for smaller, routine transactions where speed is less critical, but convenience and cost efficiency are important.

Both systems provide secure and reliable means of transferring money electronically between banks, and the choice between RTGS and NEFT depends on the urgency, transaction size, and cost considerations.